This article is an addendum to a previous article entitled: ‘Why I believe Daniel-Domscheit-Berg is an F.B.I. Informant’.
On 5 March, 2013, Daniel Domscheit-Berg appeared on a panel interview on German DW program “Agenda”.
Here is the link to that programme: http://dw.de/p/17gh
During the program, Domscheit-Berg stated a belief in the importance of whistle-blowers. This lofty attitude flies in the face of his actions in sabotaging WikiLeaks and betraying whistle-blowers, by stealing leaked documents and the encrypted submission system from the organisation.
Despite these actions and his continuous public slander of WikiLeaks, he still had the hypocrisy and audacity to refer to the organisation as “we” a number of times, during the program, presumably in continuance of his usual attempts to bath in the reflected glory generated by the achievements and continued trials endured by Julian Assange and Brad Manning. Revealingly, though, he smirked when Assange’s current Embassy incarceration was mentioned.
In case anyone should be in doubt of the importance of Domscheit-Berg in the achievements of Assange and Manning, he indicated he had met Manning and described his impression of Manning’s demeanor and motives in leaking material to WikiLeaks. By his statements, whether or not they are factual, he has publically placed himself in the position of middle-man for WikiLeaks, in relation to the Manning leaks. Given the current situation, these statements are at best, ill-advised and at worst, an incredible act of self-aggrandising stupidity. Domscheit-Berg does not present as highly intelligent but can he really be so clueless as to not realise the implications of his statements?
In response to questions as to whether he thought he would be called as a witness, in relation to the investigation, he claimed not to know. This is completely bizarre in the context of his Manning remarks, particularly when the F.B.I. are going to such lengths as to subpoena Twitter account records. Surely, given the information Domscheit-Berg provided, the pertinent question would be not, “Do you expect to be called as a witness?” but “Do you expect to be charged with Conspiracy to Commit Espionage?” – or whatever charges the U.S. Grand Jury has prepared for Julian Assange.
It is clear that he has spoken to the F.B.I. and was deemed ‘helpful’ so clearly he has already passed on information, pertaining to his involvement, to them. He would definitely have been asked to make an official statement – ergo he is an F.B.I. Informant. His lack of reticence in providing information, directly related to the investigation, on television demonstrates that the F.B.I. already has his version of events.
Based on the information he has provided in this program he will definitely be subpoenaed as a witness against Julian Assange and Brad Manning. One can only assume that either he is lying about knowing this, or the F.B.I. are unwilling to directly confirm this fact to him. This may be because the effect would be to openly confirm that Assange is to be arrested, in relation to WikiLeaks involvement in the Manning leaks, and they are still trying to maintain a pretence that they may not proceed against him.
Obviously, if Assange is to be arrested, then so is Domscheit-Berg, as he appears to be confessing to being the middle-man in what they would define as a ‘Conspiracy’. In fact, his confirmation makes him more culpable than Assange as he cannot deny knowledge. The only thing that would protect Domscheit-Berg from being charged is his ‘co-operation’ in the form of the provision of a statement against Assange and Manning. Clearly, his admissions on this program, are an admission, by implication, of this co-operation with the F.B.I.
The interviewer described Domscheit-Berg as ‘Founder’ of OpenLeaks. In a previous post I stated that I believed it was highly likely that ‘OpenLeaks’ was being maintained, as a front organisation, for the F.B.I. I also stated that I believed it was functioning as a ‘honey-pot’ to gather intelligence about would-be leakers, to prevent actual leaks occurring which could be damaging to the U.S. Government. I also voiced the fact that the F.B.I. were in a conundrum, as OpenLeaks could not be perceived to leak anything without raising the question as to why Domscheit-Berg was not being criminally charged. I suggested that this caused difficulties in maintaining the ruse that OpenLeaks was a legitimate leak organisation.
To this date, Openleaks still does not appear to be providing any actual constructive service to whistle-blowers. For months, Domscheit-Berg’s leaking activities consisted of public requests for persons to come forward to help them develop systems so they could commence functioning.
Today the OpenLeaks web-site contains information about their non-functioning email system and a ‘stream of consciousness’ diatribe, from Domscheit-Berg, about why leaking is difficult. He makes it clear that his organisation is steering clear of actual leaking but will provide information to others about how to go about it. A reasonable conclusion, from reading the information on the web-site, as provided by Domscheit-Berg’s fairly ordinary intellect, is that OpenLeaks has no such information to provide.
If OpenLeaks is being maintained as an F.B.I. ‘honey-pot’, Domschiet-Berg’s operational activity of attracting contact from potential leaders of leaking organisations, is the next best thing to receiving information from actual leakers. This would also solve the problem of maintaining Domscheit-Berg’s shaky cover story and the cover of OpenLeaks. The F.B.I. would be able to receive information they could use to identify the next generation of potential Julian Assange’s, information with great potential valuable to more than one sector of the U.S. Government.
Based upon Domscheit-Berg’s performance to date, as recently confirmed by his public comments in the above panel-interview video, there is no doubt that he is the LAST person who anyone should contact should they wish to commence leaking activities. No doubt if he receives any information about persons interested in whistle-blowing activities, he would be happy to oblige the F.B.I. by providing it to them, particularly if he could enhance his public-image whilst by doing so. One would hope that any hapless, well-meaning person would steer well clear of Domscheit-Berg and OpenLeaks.